home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: zetnet.co.uk!demon!williaj.demon.co.uk
- From: andrew@williaj.demon.co.uk (Andrew J. Williams)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.basic.visual.misc,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: "SHOULD I DUMP VISUAL BASIC?"
- Date: Sat, 03 Feb 1996 08:17:03 GMT
- Message-ID: <823335327.28831@williaj.demon.co.uk>
- References: <4e9g08$3dp@maureen.teleport.com> <Pine.SUN.3.90.960126125658.2477C-100000@menger.eecs.stevens-tech.edu> <sundial.2191.00464727@primenet.com> <DLvxyq.62w@news.hawaii.edu> <4et3p7$79o@cloud9.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: williaj.demon.co.uk
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: williaj.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- hraiser@cloud9.net wrote:
-
- >Chung Hong (chungh@Hawaii.Edu) wrote:
- >: So what? VB will still be a messed up mutated language with severe limits
- >: and incredibly frustrating to use, especially when compared with the other
- >: development tools out there like Delphi. If you've used VB and Delphi both,
- >: you'd realize that VB has much deeper problems than what including a new
- >: VB-compiler will be able to resolve.
-
- > No compiler can compensate for a weak, cumbersome, limited language like
- >(Viusal) Basic. Delphi has an excellent environment, but nothing on heaven
- >or Earth can make me go back to coding Pascal. Smart money is on Latte,
- >Borland's upcoming Java based programming environment, based on the Delphi
- >front end.
-
-
- Isn't Java an interpreted language?
- ||||||||
- | ~ ~ |
- (| @ @ |)
- ----oOOo---(__)---oOOo-------
- Andy Williams Birmingham, UK
- -----------------------------
-
-